Re: DATABASE QUESTION ! ! ! ! ! !
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 05:45:20 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns93917B639B82ls2003_at_64.164.98.29>
Off topic crosspost.
PupppyWizzard_at_glay.org (Pupppy Wizzard) wrote in news:8dcf2300.0306040241.2de0e55b_at_posting.google.com:
> Path:
> newssvr21.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm01!newsdbm01.news.prodigy.com!newscon
> 07.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!nntp.flash.net!prodigy.c
> om!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not
> -for-mail From: PupppyWizzard_at_glay.org (Pupppy Wizzard)
> Newsgroups:
> comp.database.ms-access,comp.databases.ms-sqlserver,comp.databases.info
> rmix,rec.woodworking,comp.databases.theory Subject: DATABASE QUESTION
> ! ! ! ! ! ! Date: 4 Jun 2003 03:41:39 -0700
> Organization: http://groups.google.com/
> Lines: 10
> Message-ID: <8dcf2300.0306040241.2de0e55b_at_posting.google.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.31.4.96
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1054723300 5624 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2003
> 10:41:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse_at_google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Jun 2003 10:41:40 GMT
> Xref: newsmst01.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.ms-sqlserver:118251
> comp.databases.informix:170777 rec.woodworking:902702
> comp.databases.theory:28685
>
> Hi. We are setting up a new database. We previously used MS Access,
> but we want something better.
>
> What would be a good choice for a company with 300 employees from:
>
> MS SQL SERVER
> Oracle
> Sybase
> MySQL
> Paradox
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 05 2003 - 07:45:20 CEST