Re: domains aren't subtypes, right?

"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_ywho.com> wrote in message news:<_l5Da.3$354.166_at_news.oracle.com>...

> Ironically, my expression was coherent with your idea of favoring complex
> advanced datatypes instead of many primitive ones (one per each complex type
> component)!

  Then Sir, I withdraw my challenge, and remain, etc . . .

 [ snip ]

> Generally, there are superior and inferior units. For example, Metric System
> is superior to the Old Imperial System (called "standard" in the US;-). Is
> my judgement aesthetical? Mostly, because arguments riduculing complexity of
> primitive culture artifacts never scientifically based.

   Well, now we're into a philosphical discussion entirely off-topic to   c.d.t. (But I share your sense of taste in this instance . . . .) Received on Wed Jun 04 2003 - 03:27:29 CEST