Re: oracle sequence numbers
From: Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:42:52 -0600
Message-ID: <Xns93078B83B19B3pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233>
> If course, since fractions isn't mandatory and precision is implementation
> defines, one should be very careful...
>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:42:52 -0600
Message-ID: <Xns93078B83B19B3pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233>
"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_not_pressed_ham_.karaszi_at_cornerstone.se> wrote in news:wrcW9.6554$FF4.400903_at_newsb.telia.net:
> "Pablo Sanchez" <pablo_at_dev.null> wrote in message
> news:Xns9306A51F9C83Fpingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233...
>>
> If course, since fractions isn't mandatory and precision is implementation
> defines, one should be very careful...
>
Agreed! Which means I'd rather use the vendor's built-in support first, then build a sequence table array second if the vendor doesn't support it.
-- Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering http://www.hpdbe.comReceived on Sat Jan 18 2003 - 21:42:52 CET