| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Records vs Fields
I'm going to develop with MS SQL Server 2000 a database application
whose data are coming from an Access 97 application.
Data consist of a series of MDB designed with a large number of fields
and tables (MDBs of 250-300 fields divided into 50-60 tables). All
data refer and are related to a main table. Data essentially contain
several specifications of a main photographic object (author, date,
photographer, copyright, format, analitic description and so on). All
fields are text or memo.
I tried to make some normalization to the data but but in every
solution the number of fields and tables remained unacceptable in
terms of number and maintainance.
So I changed the perspective into a "vertical" solution with simply
four tables (necessary to maintain many to many relations) and fields
"transformed" into records.
Is this solution the best in my problem ?
What are the "pro" and "contro" of such design ?
I suppose this model has been already developed and explained in other
case studies over the internet. Can you point me to some practical
samples or links ??
Thanks a lot for any help Received on Fri Jan 10 2003 - 05:52:14 CST
![]() |
![]() |