Re: Excelling with databases?

From: Undercover Elephant <9rowzn01i001_at_9rowzn01i001.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 01:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <au8ef4$esr$1_at_sparta.btinternet.com>


"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bdf69bdf.0212231600.1662ec43_at_posting.google.com...
> "Undercover Elephant" <9rowzn01i001_at_9rowzn01i001.com> wrote in message
news:<au48ke$p4t$1_at_sparta.btinternet.com>...
> > Taking the predicted numbers for 2001, if we assume that US$1 million =
1
> > inch, then OODBs would be roughly 20-22 feet high. Relational would be
> > roughly 1200-1300 feet high.
>
> This country is ridiculously metric challenged -- converting from
> dollars to feet/inches even if not required to do that! Do you think
> readers can't understand what less than 2 percent market share means?

Stay cool my friend.

I find it helpful sometimes to use an alternative way to present my argument/point. Now did you have a point yourself relevant to the discussion?

--
Akmal B. Chaudhri
Zone Editor, Special Projects (Eclipse, Grid, Web Services)
IBM developerWorks -- http://www.ibm.com/developerWorks/
WebDatabases -------- http://www.btinternet.com/~webdatabases/
Undercover Elephant - http://www.toonarific.com/u/undercoverelephant.html
Received on Tue Dec 24 2002 - 02:49:24 CET

Original text of this message