Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)

From: Thaddeus L Olczyk <olczyk_at_interaccess.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:10:27 -0500
Message-ID: <o79iguk8dv9diulsuen43fmvvv30a88c7a_at_4ax.com>


On 13 Jun 2002 22:33:46 GMT, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org> wrote:

>
>The characteristic language involving this sort of thing is Self.
><http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/labs/oocsb/self/release/Self-4.0/Tutorial/>
>
> "The Self language doesn't have any classes. When we want a new
> object, we find an existing one and copy it. We can then change the
> copy, safe in the knowledge that we have not affected anything
> else."
>
>But note that this means that Self _rejects_ the notion of "classes."
>It being an object-oriented system, that means that "classes" cannot
>be an intrinsic thing to OO.
Last time I looked the only platform that Self runs on is SunOS/Solaris. IMHO that makes it unworthy of mention. ( In other words, if it's so great why is it only accessible to a handfull of porogrammers.) Received on Fri Jun 14 2002 - 05:10:27 CEST

Original text of this message