Re: DB required to list multiple D.I.V.O.R.C.E.S. & Re-marriages
From: Paul Linehan <paul_at_not.a.chance.ie>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:16:13 GMT
Message-ID: <3c270e18.73866023_at_news.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:16:13 GMT
Message-ID: <3c270e18.73866023_at_news.tcd.ie>
Bernard Peek <bap_at_shrdlu.com> wrote:
> In message <c0d87ec0.0112201043.59809443_at_posting.google.com>, --CELKO--
> In most jurisdictions the assumption is valid. If the application is to
To be truly universal, the solution would have to allow for multiple
partner homosexual marriage and for polygynandry (and a mixture of
both).
> be universal then it may have to cope with the other forms.
To be *_useful_* however, is quite another thing.
Paul...
> Bernard Peek
-- Paul Linehan plinehan at yahoo dot com/linehanp at tcd dot ie I drink to keep body and soul apart - O. Wilde. "Mens sana in campari soda" - anon.Received on Mon Dec 24 2001 - 12:16:13 CET