Re: How to efficiently make an "history" ?

> > Why are you seem allergic to the "field" word? We both seem to
> > understand what it means and I don't see a possible confusion with
> > something in SQL.
>
> No confusion with anything in SQL, no, but a very dangerous confusion
> with the concept of "records" having "fields" in data files. This, in
> my opinion, is the real reason for never saying "field" in the context
> of relational databases.

OK, I've got it now. I now understand which confusion is possible. I was focused on SQL, which is why I didn't see the problem.

Thank you Tom. Cheers,

                            Sacha