Re: New SQL RDBMS
From: James Chapman <Jim.Chapman_at_nospam.ncr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:12:59 -0800
Message-ID: <3a68bb76_at_rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:12:59 -0800
Message-ID: <3a68bb76_at_rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com>
It seems a little late in the day to be inventing a new SQL92
implementation. The
"Greg Gaughan" <beta_at_thinksql.co.uk> wrote in message
news:xqH96.7805$UC4.146965_at_news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
current ISO (and ANSI) standard for SQL is SQL-99.
> Some of the expected advantages are:
>
> Aim is to fully support the ISO SQL/92 standard (which includes
transactions
> and sub-queries)
> Developed for 21st century operating systems and hardware
> Not written in C
> Fast multi-threaded engine
> Native ODBC API
> Multiversion concurrency control
> - readers never block other users
> - writers never block readers
> Fast recovery after power-failure or rollback
>
Received on Fri Jan 19 2001 - 23:12:59 CET