Re: Why Oracle is st00pid:

From: RK <rajXesh_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 10 Dec 2002 12:10:18 -0800
Message-ID: <548b9514.0212101210.77c82864_at_posting.google.com>


sureucanspaamme_at_hotmail.com (Johnny Random) wrote in message news:<94c83f6f.0212100639.4e3d3921_at_posting.google.com>...
> I would love to bitch slap the idiot that wrote this:
> "It is poor programming practice to have a function return multiple
> values."
>
> Gee, by that same token it must be "poor programming practice" for a
> query to return multiple rows, or multiple records for that matter.
> Apparently a function should just return 1 or 0. Then you can use
> another function to string the 0's and 1's together, then another
> function to convert them to hex, then another to convert them to
> ASCII, then another to concatinate all the values, then another
> un-concatinate the values, and finally one to bitch slap the moron
> that is so f'ing stupid that he can't see the need for a function to
> return multiple values. And that ladies and genitalmens is why Oracle
> is st00pid...

I can't believe that out of 10,000 sperm, you were the quickest.

  • rajXesh
Received on Tue Dec 10 2002 - 21:10:18 CET

Original text of this message