Re: 10,000+ Simultaneous Users

I guess that depends on the architecture (mts, etc.) Don't know yet, as that is really part of the decision, however, I was considering exactly your suggestion of mts, 10g RAM, 1ghz.

"Roelof K. Salomons" <roelofs_at_ic.uva.nl> wrote in message news:99cklb$5qm$1_at_mail.ic.uva.nl...
> Do you mean to say that at any same one time there will be
> 10,000 or more sessions busy in the database ?
>
> e.g.
> INIT.ORA:
> Get a large shared pool --> Memory: 10 G
> Use the multi-threaded server --> Processor Speed: 1 GHertz
>
> Roloph
>
>
> "Alan" <alanshein_at_spambuster.erols.com> schreef in bericht
> news:99aq3g$8me$1_at_bob.news.rcn.net...
> > What do I need in the way of hardware to support 10,000+ simulataneous
> > users, given the following:
> >
> > 1. OS must be NT (Windows 2000) as opposed to Unix.
> > 2. Each user's processing is not expected to be intense. They will be
> > running canned queries against denormalized reporting tables.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 22 2001 - 16:00:00 CET