Re: Double Encryption Illegal?
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 15:09:12 +0200
Message-ID: <39C4C278.E1A09537_at_t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 15:09:12 +0200
Message-ID: <39C4C278.E1A09537_at_t-online.de>
Tom St Denis wrote:
>
> pausch_at_saafNOSPAM.se (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
> > So you're claiming that triple-DES is no more secure than single-
> DES ???
>
> Read my message. Geez. I said "double" encryption is not the way to
> go about added security.
Could you be more explicit and explain why? Are you saying that superencipherment is always nonsense? Is 2-DES not better than DES?
M. K. Shen Received on Sun Sep 17 2000 - 15:09:12 CEST