Re: Double Encryption Illegal?
From: Tom St Denis <stdenis_at_compmore.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 15:07:20 GMT
Message-ID: <8q2mms$lav$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 15:07:20 GMT
Message-ID: <8q2mms$lav$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>
In article <39C4C278.E1A09537_at_t-online.de>,
Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de> wrote:
>
>
> Tom St Denis wrote:
> >
> > pausch_at_saafNOSPAM.se (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
> > > So you're claiming that triple-DES is no more secure than single-
> > DES ???
> >
> > Read my message. Geez. I said "double" encryption is not the way
to
> > go about added security.
>
> Could you be more explicit and explain why? Are you
> saying that superencipherment is always nonsense?
> Is 2-DES not better than DES?
Given sufficient memory 2-des is not better then des.
Tom
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Received on Sun Sep 17 2000 - 17:07:20 CEST