Re: Criticism of IFMX Buyout Postings

From: Bill Ennis <ennis_at_ssax.com>
Date: 1997/05/08
Message-ID: <5ksnl4$m5c_at_cssun.mathcs.emory.edu>#1/1


Sorry - Greg but I have to side with Mike here. That is his name - not Al! You would know that if you were a regular here - or at least read his posting carefully.

There have been some blatant fibs being told here and I applaud anyone who calls someone's bluff AND backs it up with proof such as Mike has given. It's not ok to try and manipulate people by telling lies.

Let me ask you if you pound hours of research into every transaction you make(not just stocks I mean everything here)? Sometimes we need to just act on trust. And if we have enough people out there scamming us and people like you saying "Leave em alone" where the heck will society be?

Summary:
It's not ok to TRY and manipulate people through lies. It's not ok to leave em alone.
I'm not flaming everyone who has posted to this thread; only the liars.

My 2 cents,
Bill
}
} Give it a rest Al. Who are you to tell people what rumors or related info
} they can post on this NG. If people don't have the sense to synthesize the
} myriad of postings that's their problem. And as for reporting rumors to
} the SEC, ooooooh you scare me and I'm sure old Bill is scared. With all the
} scam artists out there, do you honestly think that the SEC would waste its
} time pursuing every rumor posted on every investment news group. Just the
} hype and fraud propogated by "respected" Wall Street firms will keep them
} busy for quite some time. Complain about that, not newsgroup postings.
}
} Personally, I think the IFMX rumor is simply shareholders trying to boost
} the price, but then again, it may be true. In any event, let readers make
} their own decisions.
}
} Greg Grapsas
}
} Alvin Segel MD. <asegel_at_NO.SPAM.HERE.earthlink.com> wrote in article
} <33706FA4.2E2_at_NO.SPAM.HERE.earthlink.com>...
} > Bill,
} > Give it a rest, and let this thread die.
} > You are nothing but a useless troll and unless you have
} > a serious question (technical in nature), I suggest you
} > refrain from posting here.
} >
} > I also strongly suggest you give up on trying to manipulate
} > Informix's stock. If you insist, I'll be glad to forward your name
} > and your posts to the SEC for investigation.
} >
} > -Mike Segel
} > mikey _at_ Segel <dot> com [You know what to do with this to reply]
} > WJH wrote:
} > >
} > > Wasn't this supposed to be announced LAST Friday?
} > >
} > > Or Monday?
} > >
} > > I figured it was just another one of those shots in the dark somebody
 made.
} > >
} > > Billiam
} >
}

--
Bill Ennis                           Voice: 312-474-7516
SSA                                  Fax:   312-474-7460
500 W. Madison        email: ennis_at_ssax.com ennis_at_accesschicago.net
Received on Thu May 08 1997 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message