Re: Criticism of IFMX Buyout Postings
Date: 1997/05/08
Message-ID: <01bc5b7a$ecc989e0$1269efce_at_ggrap.mnsinc.com>#1/1
Give it a rest Al. Who are you to tell people what rumors or related info
they can post on this NG. If people don't have the sense to synthesize the
myriad of postings that's their problem. And as for reporting rumors to
the SEC, ooooooh you scare me and I'm sure old Bill is scared. With all the
scam artists out there, do you honestly think that the SEC would waste its
time pursuing every rumor posted on every investment news group. Just the
hype and fraud propogated by "respected" Wall Street firms will keep them
busy for quite some time. Complain about that, not newsgroup postings.
Personally, I think the IFMX rumor is simply shareholders trying to boost
the price, but then again, it may be true. In any event, let readers make
their own decisions.
Greg Grapsas
Alvin Segel MD. <asegel_at_NO.SPAM.HERE.earthlink.com> wrote in article
<33706FA4.2E2_at_NO.SPAM.HERE.earthlink.com>...
> Bill,
> Give it a rest, and let this thread die.
> You are nothing but a useless troll and unless you have
> a serious question (technical in nature), I suggest you
> refrain from posting here.
>
> I also strongly suggest you give up on trying to manipulate
> Informix's stock. If you insist, I'll be glad to forward your name
> and your posts to the SEC for investigation.
>
> -Mike Segel
> mikey _at_ Segel <dot> com [You know what to do with this to reply]
> WJH wrote:
> >
> > Wasn't this supposed to be announced LAST Friday?
> >
> > Or Monday?
> >
> > I figured it was just another one of those shots in the dark somebody
made.
> >
> > Billiam
>
Received on Thu May 08 1997 - 00:00:00 CEST