Re: SQL Theory/performance
Date: 1996/09/27
Message-ID: <324B56EE.DEE_at_interlog.com>#1/1
Paul Tuckfield wrote:
>
> In article <3248C8E3.D36_at_interlog.com>, spo_at_interlog.com says...
> > I want to setup an application which has all the businesss rules in
> > triggers and stored functions. However, when it comes to data entry,
> > the only way to enforce intra record updates (Field1 changing Fields2
> > and 3, etc) this way is to post and recall the updated record for each
> > field as the user types. Is this an issue?
> Not sure what you mean here, but maybe this means your data is not
> normalized. I understand that that it may be necessary though, so don't
> get excited if that is the case, I'm not criticizing.
I have a record where the values of fields in the records depend on
other fields in the same record.
Eg. (Price * Quantity) + Tax = Ammount
If I have a table with all four fields, changing any one would mean the
others have to change. I can do this in an update statement but if I
-- John Parrott Elysium Financial Systems spo_at_interlog.com http://www.interlog.com/~spoReceived on Fri Sep 27 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST