Re: ORACLE 7 Server on NT

From: Michael J. Hillanbrand II -- Dulcian, Inc. <mjhii_at_pop.erols.com>
Date: 1996/08/15
Message-ID: <32132E8A.7757_at_pop.erols.com>#1/1


Jun OZAKI wrote:
>
> I'm thinking a large database system where more than 10 users will
> dispatch transactions
> from the clients' PC at the same time.
> I prefer NT to Unix, because of its ease of maintenance, but a lot of
> people say any DB
> including ORACLE on NT works slowly when it is multitasking compared to
> Unix.
> Besides the defference of the hardware spec, is there any reason of the
> argument?
LARGE?? Large is > 100MG
you do not do large on NT.
You do not grow to large on NT.

I have heard of results where performance was adequete for what you want to do.

UNIX. UNIX. UNIX. Same box, faster better response. More options - networking, multi-cpu, memory size, ease of migration, etc.

HP has small servers that are World CLass, and SAM its sysadmin tool is easier and less complicated than NT admin. FOr that matter so is SCO.

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael J. Hillanbrand II                                Dulcian, Inc.
                   Oracle Data Base Administration
Voice: 215-773-7307                               Fax:    610-277-2966
mjhii_at_pop.erols.com                         mjh_at_salts.icpphil.navy.mil
                Delaware Valley Oracle Users Group, Inc.
Contact me for Newsletter ads, articles, book reviews & Website Info.
Received on Thu Aug 15 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message