Re: 2nd RFD: comp.databases.oracle reorganization
From: Neil Greene <ngreene_at_ni.net>
Date: 1996/07/14
Message-ID: <31E9BC84.53B_at_ni.net>#1/1
Date: 1996/07/14
Message-ID: <31E9BC84.53B_at_ni.net>#1/1
RValstar wrote:
>
> Of all the newsgroups I subscribe to, this one has the lowest value to
> traffic ratio for me (my <del> finger has a callus) as too many disparate
> topics are covered under one umbrella (thus the RFD reorg - duh). Let's
> make sure we reorg this thing so I'm happy. :-)
>
I will admit. For a dicussion group on a RDBMS, this has got to be the flatest solution we could use right now. One could probably slit these groups up similar to the Compuserve discussion groups:
RDBMS Tools Network Financials [ etc ]
Although, we probably don't need that many groups. Someone start the discussion.
-- Neil Greene "Pinky, you make me worry. You are too Sr. Oracle DBA / Unix Administrator close to being a poster child for SHL Systemhouse, Inc. - L.A. cheese wiz," Brain <URL:mailto:ngreene_at_laoc.SHL.com>Received on Sun Jul 14 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST