Re: Differences between the Microsoft and the Oracle SQL server
Date: 1996/06/29
Message-ID: <31D548FB.7BF9_at_sn.no>#1/1
an133911_at_anon.penet.fi wrote:
>...
> NOW WHY THE HELL IS THERE SUCH A THING AS DBCC IF THEY DON'T HAVE
> PROBLEMS WITH COLLISIONS???? There are systems (Informix, Sybase,
>...
> You must be high Jack-ASS! Those sites don't know what the hell
>...
> BULLSHIT! They just don't have anything to advertise!
> I've been in the consulting business for nine years now...
Have you? With that language???????????????
> ...I will not, however, ever work on SQL Server. Microsoft came
> from the bottom in single user systems. That's where they should stay!
> >have fun
> >ray charb.
> You have fun using your DBCC every night with SQL Server (old Sybase
> technology by the way) while I'm out partying it up and Oracle's
> Workgroup Server is at work providing Light's Out automated mgt. (SQL
> Server can't do that!).
Dear friends, named ones and anonymous ones! I have one Q: Is this a serious discussion??? I have watched this discussion for the sake of professional interest, but i must admit that I have troble evaluating answers from mr. ANON...
Rune. Received on Sat Jun 29 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST