Re: Q: Does it work good Oracle/2000 on NT?
Date: 1996/06/28
Message-ID: <4qvho2$fd6_at_inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>#1/1
You should have done the whole thing with Developer/2000 since you had it! Reason being is you can partition work or processes between client and server depending on what you as the developer feels best (fastest).
pavlidis_at_ibm.net (Savas Pavlidis) wrote:
>We plan to implement our first client-server application with Visual
>Basic 4 as the interface on clients. Among the alternatives is the use
>of Oracle/2000 on a Windows NT server. But we heard rumors of problems
>and/or difficulties on such implemanation. Your comments would help us
>decide. Also feel free to propose what you think it would be best.
>Clients would be Windows95 with Visual Basic 4 application (it is
>almost written).
>Your reply would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>Please reply also by e-mail.
>Savas Pavlidis
>pavlidis_at_ibm.net
Received on Fri Jun 28 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST