Re: Web Site ideal system: Oracle vs. Illustra and Sun vs. Silicon Graphics
From: John Regep <jregep_at_zenacomp.zenacomp.com>
Date: 1996/03/30
Message-ID: <4jk8go$7lo_at_zenacomp.zenacomp.com>#1/1
Date: 1996/03/30
Message-ID: <4jk8go$7lo_at_zenacomp.zenacomp.com>#1/1
Aaron,
70% of all WEB sites that use a database use Illustra,
what does that tell you?
Look at www.coldwellbanker.com and see what is posible, there is a long
-- John Regep, || _______ || ZenaComp, Incorporated Information Consultant || -----/ / || 17187 N.Laurel Park Dr. #351 jregep_at_zenacomp.com || / /______ || Livonia, Michigan 48152 1-(313)-464-3700 || -------- || FAX (313)-464-3730 http://www.zenacomp.com/~zenacomp Aaron D. Gross (aaron.g_at_ix.netcom.com) wrote:Received on Sat Mar 30 1996 - 00:00:00 CET
: My company is entertaining proposals from two vendors
: for a web site solution.
: One vendor is pushing Oracle 7.3 Universal Server,
: Designer 2000 on a Sun Sparc 50 platform.
: The other vendor is pushing Informix/Illustra and
: WebFORCE on a SGI server.
: Until today, I hadn't heard of Designer 2000.
: WebFORCE, on the other hand, appears to have
: an excellent reputation. Another consideration
: is that, as a company, the enterprise is moving
: toward Oracle. Yet, since the web server will
: not be connected to our production systems, it
: will probably be just taking nightly batch imports
: generated by SQL, anyway, so the actual database
: is less of an issue... or is it?
: I have to admit my bias is a bit more toward Informix,
: as I have experience being burned by Oracle's juggernaut
: sales staff. But I want to keep an open mind.
: Any feedback by email would be most appreciated.
: Some major decisions are being made Monday morning
: and there isn't much time left.