Re: highlighting records in a multi-record block

From: Lee Levy <levy.lee.ls_at_bhp.com.au>
Date: 1996/02/08
Message-ID: <4fdru0$9io_at_gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au>#1/1


In article <4fbaml$fan_at_spectator.cris.com>, Ken Denny <kedenny_at_mail.concentric.net> says:
>
>levy.lee.ls_at_bhp.com.au (Lee Levy) wrote:
>>OK, I know this has been discussed before, but hasnt ANYONE gotten
>>this working?
>>I have a requirement for a form which autoqueries every 15 mins, and
>>should then highlight those records which have been found in the most
>>recent fetch.
>>Logically easy.
>>Physically impossible?
>>How can I tell Forms to give a different Visual Attribute to records
>>2, 4 and 5 than used by records 1,3,6 and 7?????
>>
>>Suggestions most welcome.
>>(Please e-mail if possible as not all posts get picked up here)
>>
>>TIA
>>Lee
>
>Define a visual attribute, then use DISPLAY_ITEM(<item name>, <vis attr>)
>You will have to do this for every field within the block.
>
>Hope this helps.
>Ken Denny
>
Thanks Ken, but it wont work. The help for DISPLAY_ITEM says: "Note that DISPLAY_ITEM only affects the display of the current instance of the item; other instances of the specified item are not affected. This means that if you specify a display change for an item that exists in a multi-record block, DISPLAY_ITEM only changes the instance of that item that belongs to the block's current record."
I want to be able to change MULTIPLE records, and not necessarily the current record.

Thanks for the effort...

Any other suggestions?

Lee

------/\/\------+---------------------------------------------------
     / / /\     |  Lee Levy, ISSD Systems Development, Del Code (34)
    / / /  \    |  BHP Information Technology,  ACN 006 476 213
   / / / /\ \   |  PO Box 261, Warrawong, NSW 2502, Australia
   \ \/ / / / | PH: +61 42 75-5485 Fax: -5500 Tie: 8855-     \ / / / | Internet : levy.lee.ls_at_bhp.com.au
-----\/\/\/-----+---------------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are mostly my own, so give me some credit. Received on Thu Feb 08 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message