Re: AS/400 and DB2 vs. Unix and Oracle

From: Marc Salvatori <salvo_at_eskimo.com>
Date: 1996/01/21
Message-ID: <DLJywz.HBr_at_eskimo.com>#1/1

In <4dcacb$co1_at_lehi.kuentos.guam.net> Christopher Robato wrote: > You should see how progressive OS/400 is. How about an object oriented > design and architecture, with microkernel.

OS/400, an object-"based" kernel, I can understand. But object-oriented? Hmmmm. Please expand on your thoughts here. An object-oriented kernel should allow you to add modules without the need to re-IPL, let alone reconstruct the kernel package.

--


>< Marc J. Salvatori |                                                     

><

>< salvo_at_eskimo.com  | MIME & NeXTMail are accepted                        


><

Received on Sun Jan 21 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeffrey M. Stander: "Re: Automatic primary key in Oracle"
Previous message: Bob Kostello: "Re: DataBase program for Web site"
Maybe in reply to: Gerry Schenk: "Re: AS/400 and DB2 vs. Unix and Oracle"
Next in thread: Jeffrey M. Stander: "Re: Automatic primary key in Oracle"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message