Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP

In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.951116130048.10214E-100000_at_dbsun.vitek.com>, <vahidt_at_dbsun.vitek.com> writes:
> Path: news.eden.com!arlut.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!academ!bcm.tmc.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!news.starnet.net!wupost!dbsun.vitek.com!dbsun.vitek.com!vahidt
> From: Vahid Tadjkarimi <vahidt_at_dbsun.vitek.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip
> Subject: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP
> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 13:13:27 -0600
> Organization: BioMerieux-Vitek Inc. in Saint Louis, MO USA
> Lines: 10
> Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951116130048.10214E-100000_at_dbsun.vitek.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: dbsun.vitek.com
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Xref: news.eden.com comp.databases.oracle:54024 comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip:22053
>
>
> I wonder if anybody has experience with or already done evaluation of
> MsWindows TCP/IP stacks (e.g. Trumpet, Metmanage, ... .. products) for
> Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP. Which one do you think is better and works
> smoothly or at least you are satisfied with?
>
> Any comments, hints, feedbacks will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> vahidt_at_vitek.com
>

I bought the NetManage package. The full package had lots of tools but was cost prohibitive for the bulk of the users. I was able to cut a deal just for the Winsock layer since the bulk of the users only needed the connection and not the tools.

Novell Windows Workgroup may be the cheapest route to go. Received on Fri Nov 17 1995 - 00:00:00 CET