Re: This group is too large !

In article <3ghapb$moq_at_kaiwan.kaiwan.com> lak_at_kaiwan.com "Larry Kruper" writes:

> Any thoughts on creating subgroups for this group. I have difficulty
> with the volume posted here.
>
> This is not a criticism :)

I agree. Certainly rdb requires its own topic!

I really like reading this newsgroup buts it's too busy for me. There is some special procedure for creating new newsgroups and we should of course follow that. But first: Is there support for splitting this into c.d.o.beginners and c.d.o.tools and c.d.o.dba and c.d.o.advocacy and c.d.o.sqlnet and c.d.o.proc and c.d.o.rdb etc etc.

If you would like it split (or not) please say so and suggest the sub-divisions.

-- 
Paul Beardsell                          SAM Business Systems Ltd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                          21 Finn House, Bevenden St,
pbeardsell_at_cix.compulink.co.uk          London, N1-6BN, UK.
psb_at_sambusys.demon.co.uk                (+44 or 0)71 608-2391