Lazy Write-Back??
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 1994 21:50:35 GMT
Message-ID: <ACD008-261094164527_at_dawes.corp.mot.com>
A colleague and I tried a test to document the impact of the high water
mark
on a table that has had a spike in usage but has shrunken back down.
We ran 3 queries. The first was on a new 1100 row table, the second was on
the same table after increasing the size to 23,000 rows, and the third was
on the same table after deleting rows back down to 1100. As expected the
CPU
and hence the elapsed time for the third query was higher than the first
but
lower than the second (it takes fewer CPU cycles to search empty
datablocks),
but we were suprised to find MORE logical and physical reads on the third
query than on the second. It seemed that Oracle did more reading of
datablocks
after we deleted some rows than it did before we deleted them.
tkprof'ed resulted of our 3 queries follow:
Query 1: 1100 rows in table with low High Water Mark
select * from wip_event1 where event_datetime between
to_date('05-Sep-94','
DD-MON-YY') and to_date('06-Sep-94','DD-MON-YY')
count cpu elap phys cr cur rows Parse: 1 13 20 4 24 0 Execute: 1 0 9 1 0 2 0 Fetch: 17 54 61 20 52 0 252
Execution plan:
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'WIP_EVENT1'
Query 2: 23000 rows in table with high High Water Mark
select * from wip_event1 where event_datetime between
to_date('05-Sep-94','
DD-MON-YY') and to_date('06-Sep-94','DD-MON-YY')
count cpu elap phys cr cur rows Parse: 1 2 2 0 0 0 Execute: 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 Fetch: 17 776 872 372 441 0 252
Execution plan:
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'WIP_EVENT1'
Query 3: 1100 rows in table with high High Water Mark
select * from wip_event1 where event_datetime between
to_date('05-Sep-94','
DD-MON-YY') and to_date('06-Sep-94','DD-MON-YY')
count cpu elap phys cr cur rows Parse: 1 8 11 3 12 0 Execute: 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 Fetch: 17 123 305 407 662 0 252
Execution plan:
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'WIP_EVENT1'
Thanks,
Chip Dawes
-- I only speak for myself NOT for my employerReceived on Wed Oct 26 1994 - 22:50:35 CET