Re: Modifying blocks in Forms3
From: Steve Corbett <scorbett_at_perth.DIALix.oz.au>
Date: 5 Oct 1994 21:13:44 +0800
Message-ID: <36u8q8$e9i$1_at_perth.dialix.oz.au>
: >When I do a "(a)Block, (b)Modify" sequence, I am dumped into the
spreadtable
: >listing the three blocks (ORDERS, ITEMS, CUSTOMERS). I tabbed through
: >all the fields of ITEMS, I've ZOOMED IN and ZOOMED OUT; yet I can't
: >find the JOIN CONDITION. Did I miss something?
: >
: >For now I guess I can always delete the block and create a correct
version,
: >but shouldn't there be a better way or is there ...??
Date: 5 Oct 1994 21:13:44 +0800
Message-ID: <36u8q8$e9i$1_at_perth.dialix.oz.au>
John Morgan (John_Morgan_at_OIT.PeachNet.EDU) wrote:
: In article <35s4i0$quu_at_ra.nrl.navy.mil> Ron Lee, lee_at_grizzly.nrl.navy.mil : writes:
: >When I do a "(a)Block, (b)Modify" sequence, I am dumped into the
spreadtable
: >listing the three blocks (ORDERS, ITEMS, CUSTOMERS). I tabbed through
: >all the fields of ITEMS, I've ZOOMED IN and ZOOMED OUT; yet I can't
: >find the JOIN CONDITION. Did I miss something?
: >
: >For now I guess I can always delete the block and create a correct
version,
: >but shouldn't there be a better way or is there ...??
: No...there's no better way to do it: the JOIN condition actually creates : a set of procedures and triggers. It doesn't actually store the JOIN : condition.
The join condition becomes 'enforce key' on the appropriate column in the detail block.
--
vvv
steve corbett [ . .]
|
scorbett_at_perth.dialix.oz.au _____oOO_______OOo_____
Received on Wed Oct 05 1994 - 14:13:44 CET