Re: Safety Violations at Oracle HQ

In article <1607100011_at_igc.apc.org>, Worklife Education Resource Center <worklife_at_igc.apc.org> writes:
> From: Worklife Education Resource Center <worklife>
> Subject: Safety Violations at Oracle HQ
>
> NUMEROUS HEALTH & SAFETY VIOLATIONS CITED AT ORACLE
>

	As I read the 'violations' they all revolve around the methods used by
	an independant subcontractor to manage and control their employees.
	How, by any stretch of the imagination is this the fault of Oracle
	Corporation?

	Define 'lawlessness.'  Oracle has entered into a legal and binding
	contract for the services.  If, based upon the information so far
	reported, they arbitrarily cancel that contract, would they not be
	liable for action by the janitorial service?

> WHY DOES ORACLE BLOCK INFORMATION?

	In what regard can it possibly be argued that Oracle has a 
	to interject itself into a dispute between an independant 
	subcontractor and its employees?  Oracle has no legal responsibility
	to take one side or the other.

>
> WHY IS ORACLE FIGHTING SO VICIOUSLY OVER PENNIES?

	Oracle is not arguing over pennies.  It is operating in conformance
	with a legal contractual arrangement.