Re: Safety Violations at Oracle HQ
Date: 12 Jul 1993 14:23:40 GMT
Message-ID: <21rs5c$3k1_at_c3po.jvnc.net>
In article 148_at_helix.nih.gov, des_at_helix.nih.gov (David E. Scheim) writes:
>In article <1607100011_at_igc.apc.org> Worklife Education Resource Center <worklife_at_igc.apc.org> writes:
>>WHY DOES ORACLE CONTINUE TO DEFEND LAWLESSNESS?
>
>It seems that there would be a quick way to bring this thread to an end for
>those who find this discussion so distateful. Given this government ruling
>against Medallion, why doesn't Oracle drop this contractor and choose
>another, non-union or union, that at least pays its employees and minimum
>poverty wage and complies with the law. -- David Scheim
David, while that makes sense, we're not getting the whole picture in these posts. Oracle Corporation leases their building from William Wilson & Associates. The owners of the building have the contract with Medallion.
Carl Fogelin (fogelinc_at_pt.cyanamid.com) "All opinions are strictly mine"
Up the long ladder and down the short rope, To Hell with King Billy and God bless the Pope. -- traditional Received on Mon Jul 12 1993 - 16:23:40 CEST