RE: Join Anti-SQL SIG
From: <rzx2122_at_mcvax2.d48.lilly.com>
Date: 1 Jun 93 08:09:26 EST
Message-ID: <1993Jun1.080926.1_at_mcvax2.d48.lilly.com>
Date: 1 Jun 93 08:09:26 EST
Message-ID: <1993Jun1.080926.1_at_mcvax2.d48.lilly.com>
Why would anyone want to promote an AntiSQL SIG??
Why not a positive SIG, like BTSQL (Better Than SQL)??
(insert creative positive ideas here)
SQL was a positive step. What's the next better solution??
ELIZA> Why are you so negative?
RZX2122 is post only.
Please reply publicly or 72072.2122_at_compuserve.com.
Received on Tue Jun 01 1993 - 15:09:26 CEST