Re: NASA/Need Opinions On Oracle

From: John Thomas <uqecd08_at_ucl.ac.uk>
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:13:16 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Apr07.211316.81637_at_link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk>


barrydm_at_dryden.dfrf.nasa.gov (Mark Barry) writes:

>different vendors: Ingres, Informix, Sybase and Oracle. Considering either
>of these two hardware platforms, can anyone express opinions and/or exper-
>iences with Oracle? Thanks...

Quick answer:

You want the latest bees knees that does everything quickest on only the very latest platform? - Don't use Oracle.

You want a solid (though not always without bugs) data-processing RDBMS with _relatively_ easy to use data-entry and report generation tools. You also want to be able to communicate with other SQL databases running on quite different platforms & port your applications to them, either now or in the future. And a system that's well known, (sometimes with poor Oracle support) by lots of programmers, DBAs and SyS Admins... choose Oracle.

(Two year's experience of Oracle PC, 12 months on AIX - application medical database with up to 240,000 records in each of 50+ tables.)

-- 
|   v___v    | John Thomas, Programmer         e-mail: J.Thomas_at_ucl.ac.uk     |
|  / o-o \   | LEPRA Evaluation Project                                       |
|  \__Y__/   | London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine                 |
| ( ~ ~ ~ )  | Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England                            |
Received on Tue Apr 07 1992 - 23:13:16 CEST

Original text of this message