Re: OCI vs SQLLIB
From: Volker Hetzer <volker.hetzer_at_ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 13:38:01 +0200
Message-ID: <e3a4m9$oa4$1_at_nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com>
>
Different user s have different requirements which translate into different definitions for "efficiency".
Some can afford to spend half a year on a program and need maximum execution speed, some don't care about speed but need minimum developer time, some need small executables, some need to interact with other API's (like .NET or whatever) and other's have a host of other requirements.
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 13:38:01 +0200
Message-ID: <e3a4m9$oa4$1_at_nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com>
sunil schrieb:
> Anybody please...
>
> sunil wrote:
>> Why both OCI & SQLLIB? If OCI is more efficient then remove SQLLIB and >> make Pro*C generate OCI calls. If SQLLIB calls are more efficient then >> what is the need of OCI?
>
Different user s have different requirements which translate into different definitions for "efficiency".
Some can afford to spend half a year on a program and need maximum execution speed, some don't care about speed but need minimum developer time, some need small executables, some need to interact with other API's (like .NET or whatever) and other's have a host of other requirements.
That is the reason for more than one API, just as it is the reason for more than one programming language, hardware or operating system.
Volker Received on Wed May 03 2006 - 13:38:01 CEST