Re: Code in the database or middle tier (the CLR controversy)

From: William Stacey [MVP] <staceywREMOVE_at_mvps.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:36:02 -0400
Message-ID: <uDj4$QIaFHA.4040_at_TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>


> Not at all: That is not what I am saying. What I am saying is that
> those who are using them are far more likely to have training in
> RDBMSs and thus be more knowledgeable and more competent.

That is stating the obvious.

>> Are programmers using PL/SQL on the app side any smarter w.r.t.
>> relational SQL than those using VB? Do they write better SQL because they
>> use PL/SQL?
>
> Yes. Yes. Yes.

Be serious. Red is also better then blue if you prefer red.

>> IMHO, there is nothing inherintly worse in VB/SQL compared to PL/SQL...
>
> Other than speed and scalability and security?

What facts do you have to back this up? Or is this just your opinion?

> But that is irrelevant
> This isn't about the language or its capabilities.

You brought up the VB thing. There are many talented SQL people out there that also use VB and/or c#.

-- 
William Stacey [MVP]
 
Received on Fri Jun 03 2005 - 23:36:02 CEST

Original text of this message