Re: Forms: RG property "Record Group Query Size" - what is it ?

From: Frank Piron <empty_at_zero.nil>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:16:51 +0200
Message-ID: <opsc906dr2m0et4w_at_news.online.de>


Hi,

[Quoted] Am Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:31:18 +0200 schrieb Jan Gelbrich <j_gelbrich_at_westfalen-blatt.de>:

> "Frank Piron" <empty_at_zero.nil> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:opsc8s24cgm0et4w_at_news.online.de...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:50:40 +0200 schrieb Jan Gelbrich
>> <j_gelbrich_at_westfalen-blatt.de>:

> Thank You, Frank, for Your comment.
>
> But in a way, it does not make much sense to me.
> Because: in a classic Name Search Problem,
> the shorter the name part that is typed into the item field that is
> calling
> a LOV,
> the more Names would match the pattern (e.g. 1000 matches for short
> pattern
> "Smi%"),
> and if the full name is typed, only few names would be left to fit
> (e.g. only 3 for long pattern "Schlottermeier%" )
> and to be chosen from a LOV.

You wrote, that with smaller RGQS values your LOV did not work for long patterns.
Did it not work at all or only with poor performance?

-- 
Crisis? What Crisis?
----------------------------------------------------
f_r_a_n_k_a_t_k_o_n_a_d_d_o_t_n_e_t
Received on Wed Aug 25 2004 - 09:16:51 CEST

Original text of this message