Re: SQL*Plus replacement available - SPAM SPAM SPAM
From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 14:48:32 -0700
Message-ID: <1086472123.330677_at_yasure>
>
> Fine. Anything remotely to do with thirdparty.
>
> I would say absolutely none. The only thing I would say about
> marketplace is that when I first started lurking around here, I thought
> that marketplace was a misnamed jobs board. It's all jobs and I couldn't
> even see any tools or other stuff (except the usual crossposted
> rubbish).
>
> I resent this remark. I am absolutely *_NOT_* a spammer,
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 14:48:32 -0700
Message-ID: <1086472123.330677_at_yasure>
Paul wrote:
>>And a place to announce user group meetings >>And a place to post seminar announcements >>And a place to post requests for Beta testers >>And a place to post ....
>
> Fine. Anything remotely to do with thirdparty.
My point was that we have a place for all of these things. We don't need to create a proliferation of usetnet groups to cater to the small number of posters/spammers that can't abide by very simple rules.
>>We have it already ... what no one has yet had the courage to step >>up to the plate and answer is ... what is the harm in posting to >>c.d.o.marketplace.
>
> I would say absolutely none. The only thing I would say about
> marketplace is that when I first started lurking around here, I thought
> that marketplace was a misnamed jobs board. It's all jobs and I couldn't
> even see any tools or other stuff (except the usual crossposted
> rubbish).
To which one might suggest that you could have read the charter.
>>You spammers (not you personally perhaps Paul)
>
> I resent this remark. I am absolutely *_NOT_* a spammer,
How can you resent a remark after I specifically said "not you personally"? Those words were written for a reason.
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Sat Jun 05 2004 - 23:48:32 CEST