Re: Oracle Forms vs Visual Studio .Net

Greg Forestieri wrote:

> jeff_at_work.com (Jeff) wrote in message news:<bum56t$d3r$1@cronkite.cc.uga.edu>...
>

>>In article <6a8cdd95.0401210526.4564cf72_at_posting.google.com>, gforestieri9_at_yahoo.com (Greg Forestieri) wrote:
>>
>>
[Quoted] >>>Jeff, whether your household is a household of 1 or a household of 12
>>>your responsibility is to earn as much over the long run as well as
>>>consistently possible.  There is that which is fun (or ideal, or
>>>optimum) and there is that which pays the bills.  Sometimes they are
>>>not the same.
>>
>>And to hell with your employer, eh?  If it were only a choice over which to 
>>learn (for the purposes of future employment), the argument would make sense, 
>>but when picking one for the shop in which you work, it's a very poor argument 
>>indeed.  In fact, using this argument in justification could easily get you 
>>fired... not exactly good for paying the bills.

I never advocate screwing one's employer. I believe professional ethics must at all times be high. If you don't like your employer ... quit. At the same time ... if two solutions are equally viable ... the employee that doesn't choose the one the most enhances the employee's employability is a fool. And no employer should want a fool for an employee.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)