Re: A better SQL*Plus -- what features should it have?
From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:54:06 -0000
Message-ID: <3dca2a2e$0$1287$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:54:06 -0000
Message-ID: <3dca2a2e$0$1287$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>
[Quoted] [Quoted] A prompt that tells you reliably what database you are on.
[Quoted] A syntax checker that doesn't throw away invalid sql when your very first
word is unrecognised
sleect * from ...
[Quoted] [Quoted] On the other hand sqlplus is reliable, works well and does the job and there [Quoted] are already replacements out ther, I'd see a market for your product of approximately 8 copies.
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK ***************************************** Please include version and platform and SQL where applicable It makes life easier and increases the likelihood of a good answer ****************************************** "toolsguy" <no_at_spam.for.me> wrote in message news:aqd33s02rht_at_drn.newsguy.com...Received on Thu Nov 07 2002 - 09:54:06 CET
> I am developing a "better SQL*Plus". What features do you expect from a
> better SQL*Plus?
>
> Up-arrow to bring back commands from history is an obvious feature that
> is sorely missing in SQL*Plus. What else?
>