Re: Why choose MS Windows NT/2000 for in stead of Solaris?

From: koert54 <koert54_at_nospam.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 18:30:42 GMT
Message-ID: <mVAF7.10932$eI3.1033_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be>


> 1. Oracle and Sun is working very close together (to bring down MS?)

[Quoted] Well - I've heard that relationship is coming to an end. Sun is working on it's own database software - and that's
something Larry doesn't like ...

> 2. Anyting else is a port, at least the Rdbms. Is this true for the app
> tier?

I thought NT was also a development platform ...

These are just 'rumours' - nothing more - can anyone confirm ?

"Johan Wegener" <xjohan.xwegener_at_xgmx.xnet> wrote in message news:DUzF7.5267$RM3.482177_at_news000.worldonline.dk...
> You've probably heard this one before, but I'm going to a meeting tomorrow
> morning and need a little fast input:
>
> Why choose MS Windows NT/2000 in stead of Solaris as Oracle based
production
> platform? Either as database tier or application (Forms/Reports) tier?
>
> Personally I certainly prefer Solaris for the database server, but I am
> looking for good reasons to run Oracle Forms/Reports server on Solaris?
> Anybody doing it?! Bad og good? Any response out there is certainly
> appreciated...
>
> I've heard:
> 1. Oracle and Sun is working very close together (to bring down MS?)
> 2. Anyting else is a port, at least the Rdbms. Is this true for the app
> tier?
>
> Thanks,
> Johan
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 05 2001 - 19:30:42 CET

Original text of this message