Re: plus80.exe
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:33:41 +0100
Message-ID: <t88sh639vj9taa_at_beta-news.demon.nl>
Beq is acronym for bequeath which is a variant of interprocess
communication. This works locally on the server only.
If I understand your situation correctly you are not on the server
12203 unable to connect to destination means sqlnet can't establish low
level communications to the host.
You need to setup an ordinary tcp/ip connection.
Hth,
[Quoted] Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
"Philip" <phsan_at_cs.siu.edu> wrote in message
news:961bj1$432$1_at_saluki-news.it.siu.edu...
> I find I can not run the the program generated by Pro C and MS Visual C,
the
> program can not establish the connection to the oralce server on Solaris,
> and I find I can NOT run .\bin\plus80.exe either, it generates the
following
> errors.
>
> SQL*Plus: Release 8.0.6.0.0 - Production on Fri Feb 9 12:23:52 2001
> (c) Copyright 1999 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
> Enter user-name: test01
> ERROR:
> ORA-12203: TNS:unable to connect to destination
>
> Enter user-name:
>
> The sqlnet.txt generated by plus80.exe is :
>
> ***********************************************************************
> Fatal NI connect error 12203, connecting to:
>
>
(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=BEQ)(PROGRAM=oracle80)(ARGV0=o
>
racle80ORCL)(ARGS='(DESCRIPTION=(LOCAL=YES)(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=beq)))')))(CON
>
NECT_DATA=(SID=ORCL)(CID=(PROGRAM=F:\orant\BIN\PLUS80.EXE)(HOST=TEMPPC39)(US
> ER=Administrator))))
>
> VERSION INFORMATION:
> TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 8.0.6.0.0 - Production
> Oracle Bequeath NT Protocol Adapter for 32-bit Windows: Version
8.0.6.0.0 -
> Production
> Time: 09-FEB-01 12:23:55
> Tracing not turned on.
> Tns error struct:
> nr err code: 12203
> TNS-12203: TNS:unable to connect to destination
> ns main err code: 12560
> TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
> ns secondary err code: 0
> nt main err code: 530
> TNS-00530: Protocol adapter error
> nt secondary err code: 0
> nt OS err code: 0
>
>
> I don't know what the "bep" protocol is, any idea?
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Philip
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 09 2001 - 20:33:41 CET