Re: Designer/2000: system requirements for Workstation?

OK in that case - upgrade processor ;)
[Quoted] 256M is quite much - never seen that stated for the workstation, for the server perhaps?

Henk Hultink wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I completely forgot. I am currently working with Designer/2000 v1.3.2, but
> we are going to migrate to version 6 or 6i.
> Minimum system demands according to Oracle, are 256Mb RAM and a Pentium
> 166MHz, but I think that above all the processor should really be better...
>
> "Frank van Bortel" <fbortel_at_home.nl> schreef in bericht
> news:3A2A9AF0.274B9325_at_home.nl...
> > Henk, please state the version - from the fact you use Designer/2000
> > I take it you are talking about V1.3.2 (latest version to support Forms
 4.5).
> > On the other hand: these do not run (rather: install) on Win2K or ME...
> > And, as usual, the aswer is: depends.
> > However, let's take a reasonable set of sessions:
> > - Designer/2000 Front Panel
> > - Designer/2000 Navigator
> > - Designer/2000 Module Data Diagrammer, with Forms generator
> > running every now and then.
> > - Forms Designer, plus Forms runtime every now and then.
> > 64 - 96MB would do, plus some OS overhead: 128M would be comfortable.
> > Less can still be OK, provided you have fast disks (swapping).
> > Processor power is less significant then memory - if I were to choose
> > between a processor upgrade to a 50% faster model, and double the memory,
> > I'd go for the memory. (Provided I had speed problems, due to swapping).
> >
> > In general: 128MB plus any processor, faster than 266MHz would do.
> > I've been working 1.3.2 locally on a 192MB 266MHz laptop, inclusive
> > local database for the repository, and a Webserver on NT4WS for years.
> >
> > Henk Hultink wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think this question may have been asked before, but does anyone know
> > > requirements for a workstation to work conveniently with Designer/2000
 in a
> > > network environment?
> > > I have an Oracle document on this, but it is a bit aged, and only gives
> > > minimum requirements, which is usually not really good enough.
> > > For example, does it run on Windows ME or Windows 2000? How much memory
 and
> > > what processor do I need.
> > > Most of all I am interested in answers from people who speak from their
 own
> > > experience.
> > >
> > > Greetings and tia,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Henk Hultink
> > >
> > > Stoas Wageningen
> > > "Activating Knowledge"
> > > hhu_at_nospam.stoas.nl
> > > for e-mail remove the nospam-filter
> >
> > --
> > Gtrz,
> >
> > Frank van Bortel
> >
> >

--
Gtrz,

Frank van Bortel