Re: Developer 6: Comparison to Dev/2000

From: <dahlsg_at_my-dejanews.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 12:52:02 GMT
Message-ID: <7f231g$46e$1_at_nnrp1.dejanews.com>

[Quoted] In article <FA52ED.E12.0.-s_at_inmet.camb.inmet.com>, "Gerald Winslow" <winslow_at_intermetrics.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> First, I'm new to Oracle tools, so please forgive my ignorance. I've just
> started looking at Dev/2000 v. 5. And now along comes Dev. 6. So, what
> specifically is new to 6 that wasn't in 5? Also, is 6 more stable than 5?
>
> Thanks for your thoughts!
> gw
>
> I'd be interested to know as well! Has anyone actually upgraded to this? How [Quoted]
about from 4.5, skipping 5.x? Oracle says there is NO migration path...

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own Received on Wed Apr 14 1999 - 14:52:02 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Maciej Zoltowski: "Reports 2.5 - how to expand a line"
Previous message: taienzhi_at_my-dejanews.com: "Re: Coexistence of 4.5 and 5.0 on a PC"
In reply to: Gerald Winslow: "Developer 6: Comparison to Dev/2000"
In reply to Gerald Winslow: "Developer 6: Comparison to Dev/2000"
Next in thread: Craig J.B.: "Re: Developer 6: Comparison to Dev/2000"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message