Re: Forms 5.0 Very Simple Annoying Question/Problem, or bug???

I haven't tried this, but Does 'synchronize;' help? -jay

In article <362E0402.4942DD89_at_cisco.com>,   jagould_at_cisco.com wrote:
> Thanks for the sanity check.
>
> I haven't been able to locate a screen refresh, but putting the line :
>
> PAUSE;
>
> in the code seems to work. However, it pops up an ugly dialog. The
> only other workaround I could find is to cause an exception. Pause seems
> to be the lesser of two evils.
>
> Joe Brown wrote:
> >
> > Just to let you know you're not going out of your mind. There does
> > appear to be a bug with forms 5.0 and radio buttons.
> >
> > I've got a set of radio buttons in a control block I used to set the
> > where clause of a datablock. Every time I start the form, the radio
> > buttons are all blank. I set default value, jump through a couple of
> > other hoops, but they have remained blank, until refreshing the screen
> > some how.
> >
> > I havn't tried (whatever the built-in) to refresh the screen...
> > Hmmm...
> >
> > In article <362CD58B.9E2D5430_at_cisco.com>, user <USERID_at_cisco.com> wrote:
> > >I have a simple two line trigger that is causing an annoying little
> > >problem that I can't resolve. The first line of the trigger sets the
> > >'DEFAULT_WHERE' clause of my block. The second line contains
> > >EXECUTE_QUERY. When this trigger fires it doesn't update the data in
> > >any of my radio buttons. However, if I insert a record then delete it,
> > >all of the radio buttons get refreshed. Anyone have a work-around?
> >
> > --
> > (: Joe Brown :) joe_at_apache.dtcc.edu
> > I believe Wine is going to be great if it ever gets finished. . .
> > I believe Linux _is_ great even though it's not finished! ! !
> > I believe you have my address. :-)
>

[Quoted] -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own Received on Wed Oct 21 1998 - 23:07:41 CEST