Re: why not mysql revisited

In article <occffv$u60$1_at_dont-email.me>, gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com says...
>
> On Fri, 07 Apr 2017 06:01:16 ???????
>
> >?
> >
> >???????????????why not mysql"??
> >??????????????????????
> >?????????????????????
> >???????????????????????
> >????????????????????
> >???????????
> >??????????????
> >
> >??
> >???
>
>
> I hope this is not one of those "which one is better"?????
> depends on your needs. You would be ill advised to run a huge multi-TB
> OLTP database with several thousands of concurrent users and 99.99%
> uptime requirement like Amazon.com or a large bank on MySQL. On the other
> hand, if you need a help ticket application or small to medium size web
> site, Oracle may definitely be too expensive. So, the question is what do
> you need your database for? And another very important question: what
> color do you need that database to be? I suggest mauve, it takes least
> RAM.
Why such a sarctastic response?

Everyone knows that taupe is the least RAM-intensive colour.

-- 
jeremy