Re: Incompetent Oracle Support
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fbede9ff-a716-4ea8-9ed0-75211e759b62_at_w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
On Jul 27, 8:44 am, "The Boss" <use..._at_No.Spam.Please.invalid> wrote:
> Noons wrote:
> > On Jul 25, 12:59 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I know about it. What I don't understand is why Oracle doesn't
> >> give us back the venerable Metalink. What is the advantage of this
> >> monster?
>
> > It prepares the way for Oracle to purchase Flash from Adobe - or Adobe
> > entirely - and therefore one more piece of "web 2.0" falls in their
> > hands. They already got MySQL and Java, which nobody wangted anyway.
>
> It won't be called "web 2.0" for long:
> - 'web' will be replaced by 'OOW' (Oracle Open Web)
> or OUW (Oracle Univers.., ehm ... Unbreakable Web)
> - as Larry doesn't like .0 versions, the numbering will be changed to 2.1
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fbede9ff-a716-4ea8-9ed0-75211e759b62_at_w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
On Jul 27, 8:44 am, "The Boss" <use..._at_No.Spam.Please.invalid> wrote:
> Noons wrote:
> > On Jul 25, 12:59 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I know about it. What I don't understand is why Oracle doesn't
> >> give us back the venerable Metalink. What is the advantage of this
> >> monster?
>
> > It prepares the way for Oracle to purchase Flash from Adobe - or Adobe
> > entirely - and therefore one more piece of "web 2.0" falls in their
> > hands. They already got MySQL and Java, which nobody wangted anyway.
>
> It won't be called "web 2.0" for long:
> - 'web' will be replaced by 'OOW' (Oracle Open Web)
> or OUW (Oracle Univers.., ehm ... Unbreakable Web)
> - as Larry doesn't like .0 versions, the numbering will be changed to 2.1
Ah, Oracle: the modern CA... Received on Mon Jul 26 2010 - 19:07:24 CDT