Re: Incompetent Oracle Support
From: The Boss <usenet_at_No.Spam.Please.invalid>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:44:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4c4e0fb7$0$10734$e4fe514c_at_dreader11.news.xs4all.nl>
Noons wrote:
> On Jul 25, 12:59 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, I know about it. What I don't understand is why Oracle doesn't
>> give us back the venerable Metalink. What is the advantage of this
>> monster?
>
> It prepares the way for Oracle to purchase Flash from Adobe - or Adobe
> entirely - and therefore one more piece of "web 2.0" falls in their
> hands. They already got MySQL and Java, which nobody wangted anyway.
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:44:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4c4e0fb7$0$10734$e4fe514c_at_dreader11.news.xs4all.nl>
Noons wrote:
> On Jul 25, 12:59 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, I know about it. What I don't understand is why Oracle doesn't
>> give us back the venerable Metalink. What is the advantage of this
>> monster?
>
> It prepares the way for Oracle to purchase Flash from Adobe - or Adobe
> entirely - and therefore one more piece of "web 2.0" falls in their
> hands. They already got MySQL and Java, which nobody wangted anyway.
It won't be called "web 2.0" for long:
- 'web' will be replaced by 'OOW' (Oracle Open Web)
or OUW (Oracle Univers.., ehm ... Unbreakable Web) - as Larry doesn't like .0 versions, the numbering will be changed to 2.1
-- JeroenReceived on Mon Jul 26 2010 - 17:44:02 CDT