Re: semvmx
From: John Hurley <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <959b33fb-8583-4dac-bd98-c29b240ba0cd_at_t20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 17, 3:02 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <959b33fb-8583-4dac-bd98-c29b240ba0cd_at_t20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 17, 3:02 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
snip
> Is that an important difference, enough to bring down production for a
> kernel rebuild? Is this the sort of thing that might double semaphore
> or other dependent memory structure sizes in actual use as Oracle
> decides a granular boundary is passed? Or is it just something
> trivial?
I have given up the hpuxrac handle ... but it is set to 32768 on my 1 remaining hpux box ( that used to have an Oracle database on it ).
If you are not running into any problems I think I would leave it alone.
If you do the OCM thing then you don't need to do the RDA thing right? Received on Thu Mar 18 2010 - 12:27:38 CDT