Re: "Correct" term for a 1:1 relationship between a "database" and an "instance" where > 1 such things are on the same physical server?

From: dana <dana_at_work_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <949ef07c-9166-4abb-993e-a7d52ca3a7bf_at_y19g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>

Thanks Mark, Joel, and Will. :-) Received on Mon Jul 27 2009 - 05:47:16 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: stevedhoward_at_gmail.com: "Re: Rman level 0 incremental backup – why restore needs older backups?"
Previous message: dana: "Re: UML 2.0 for database modeling versus ER diagrams?"
Maybe in reply to: dana: ""Correct" term for a 1:1 relationship between a "database" and an "instance" where > 1 such things are on the same physical server?"
Next in thread: Mark D Powell: "Re: "Correct" term for a 1:1 relationship between a "database" and an "instance" where > 1 such things are on the same physical server?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message