Re: can you take a schema offline?
From: jgar the jorrible <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <04a25615-3d83-443d-a3f8-414fa206061c_at_p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 12, 9:12 pm, rgvguplb <rgvgu..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 12, 7:57 pm, Palooka <nob..._at_nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> > They don't document, audit nor follow any kind of change control procedure.
>
> > So why should they bother backing up either?
>
> You document???? Well good on you.
>
> Sure, i may not be as good at this as you might be, but then that's
> why i asked. If everyone on this group were an expert, wouldn't this
> be a pretty quiet group?
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <04a25615-3d83-443d-a3f8-414fa206061c_at_p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 12, 9:12 pm, rgvguplb <rgvgu..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 12, 7:57 pm, Palooka <nob..._at_nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> > They don't document, audit nor follow any kind of change control procedure.
>
> > So why should they bother backing up either?
>
> You document???? Well good on you.
>
> Sure, i may not be as good at this as you might be, but then that's
> why i asked. If everyone on this group were an expert, wouldn't this
> be a pretty quiet group?
Quite the contrary, I assure you.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.oracle.server/browse_frm/month/2000-01Received on Sun Mar 15 2009 - 17:09:17 CDT