Re: PGA size and server process

From: Mark D Powell <Mark.Powell_at_eds.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3daa5035-25c6-4870-bb7e-32e0606a3858@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>


On Jun 3, 11:10 pm, Woody Ling <woodyl..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6$B7n(B4$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B10$B;~(B08$BJ,(B, Woody Ling <woodyl..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am now using dedicated server connection and I set
> > pga_aggregate_target=1G. I find that there are total 5 server
> > processes running by "ps -ef | grep oracle$SID"
>
> > Does it mean that each server process can consume up to 1G so that the
> > total PGA size is 5G?
> > or
> > 1G PGA are shared by all server processes?
>
> > If it is shared by all server processes, why does it call "dedicated"?
>
> > How to check the current size of PGA?
>
> > Thanks.
> > Woody Ling
> > Hong Kong
>
> As I know that each server process has it's own PGA (shared or
> dedicated server). If there are 5 server processes, there will be 5
> PGA.
> Actually I think that pga_aggregate_target size is the total size of
> all PGA which can be allocated by one instance. If it is set to 1G,
> each PGA get 200M if their loading are similar. If there is only 1
> server process, it's PGA can consume up to 1G memory.
>
> Am I correct?
> How to know the size of all existing PGA?
>
> Thanks.
> Woody Ling
> Hong Kong- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Woody,

What version of Oracle?

Are you using automatic memory management or tradition manual memory/ workload management?

You can find information on the PGA in the Oracle9i Database Concepts Release 2 (9.2) Part Number A96524-0, CH 7, Memory Architecture (or equilivent for your version)

The ps -ef command does not show an accurate view of the memory Oracle sessions use because Oracle uses shared memory segments and the same memory will show as being used by multiple processes display by a ps - ef command.

You can query the pga in use via Oracle using views referenced in the above manual material.

HTH -- Mark D Powell -- Received on Wed Jun 04 2008 - 12:31:51 CDT

Original text of this message