Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Enterprise Data Architecture

Re: Enterprise Data Architecture

From: <fitzjarrell_at_cox.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:38:48 -0700
Message-ID: <1192217928.867607.244470@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>


Comments embedded.
On Oct 11, 8:37 pm, hjr.pyth..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 12, 9:07 am, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 4:22 am, Parker <parkershan..._at_comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > This e-book contains over 1,100 pages of information that establish a
> > > new paradigm for the integrated Enterprise Data Architecture. It is a
> > > practical reference for the information technology professional.
> > > Organized hierarchically and amplified by more than 750 illustrations,
> > > it contains database and data warehouse concepts, techniques, data,
> > > process and object models, components, patterns, processes and views.
> > > There are downloadable example and installable database prototypes,
> > > PowerPoint presentations, database viewer, query library and data
> > > quality analysis and data migration tools.
>
> > >https://home.comcast.net/~parkershannon/index.html
>
> > Very interesting, but posts like these are considered spam on this
> > group. Please delete, repost elsewhere as per group charter.
>
> > By the way, some dictionaries do list architect as a verb now. cf
> > dictionary.com, among others, in spite of all the bloggers who say
> > otherwise. Language evolves. Heck, I don't even like the verb
> > administrate, I'd rather administer, but that's tough cookies, eh?
>
> > jg
> > --
> > @home.com is bogus.
> > rocking back and forth, back and forth...http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20071010/news_1b10donlan.html
>
> What on Earth does "I architected" have over "I designed"?! Apart from
> two syllables and a lot of ugliness, that is?

It leverages the synergy existent in the transcendental plane of intellectual appearance. :)

>
> Language does indeed evolve... but that's no excuse for its *abuse*!
>

I agree, but then the unknowing would have difficulty expressing pseudo-intelligence.

> Yup, I agree with you on "to administrate", too. It's completely
> stupid. Nothing that "to administer" couldn't do in less syllables and
> typing.
>
> Chewy biscuits, indeed.
> HJR- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

David Fitzjarrell Received on Fri Oct 12 2007 - 14:38:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US